top of page
Search

R. v. G

October 2016


Ariel’s client was charged with murder in a cold case where advances in forensic

technology allowed police to locate G.’s fingerprints and DNA at the scene of the homicide. At

trial, Ariel convinced the judge to take the exceptional step of staying the proceedings (the

functional equivalent of an acquittal) due to evidence lost or destroyed by the police.

9 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

R. v. A.

January 2022 Ariel successfully appealed a Superior Court judge's decision to commit his client to trial on a charge of first degree murder, arguing that the preliminary inquiry judge was correct in f

R. v B.

December 2021 Ariel's client was acquitted of serious fentanyl trafficking and firearm possession charges in Superior Court after the trial judge found that there was a reasonable doubt about his know

R. v A.

July 2021 Ariel's client was acquitted of possessing a loaded handgun despite videos of a person who appeared to be him in possession of the gun. His confession to possessing the firearm was excluded

bottom of page