top of page

R. v A.

July 2021


Ariel's client was acquitted of possessing a loaded handgun despite videos of a person who appeared to be him in possession of the gun. His confession to possessing the firearm was excluded from evidence after a breach of his rights to counsel was found by the trial judge.

24 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

R. v. A.

January 2022 Ariel successfully appealed a Superior Court judge's decision to commit his client to trial on a charge of first degree murder, arguing that the preliminary inquiry judge was correct in f

R. v B.

December 2021 Ariel's client was acquitted of serious fentanyl trafficking and firearm possession charges in Superior Court after the trial judge found that there was a reasonable doubt about his know

R. v. D.

February 2021 Ariel’s client was charged with the first degree murder of a man shot several times in the head in an Islington apartment building. A person matching Ariel’s client’s physical descripti

bottom of page