top of page

R. v. D.

February 2012


Ariel’s client was discharged after preliminary inquiry of arson endangering life where it was alleged that he was using butane gas to make hemp oil, which caused a large explosion that completely destroyed two houses. The court was not satisfied that there was sufficient evidence of Ariel’s client’s involvement.

9 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

R. v. A.

January 2022 Ariel successfully appealed a Superior Court judge's decision to commit his client to trial on a charge of first degree murder, arguing that the preliminary inquiry judge was correct in f

R. v B.

December 2021 Ariel's client was acquitted of serious fentanyl trafficking and firearm possession charges in Superior Court after the trial judge found that there was a reasonable doubt about his know

R. v A.

July 2021 Ariel's client was acquitted of possessing a loaded handgun despite videos of a person who appeared to be him in possession of the gun. His confession to possessing the firearm was excluded

bottom of page