top of page

R. v. D

October 2020


Ariel’s client was discharged after preliminary inquiry of Attempted Murder and Discharge firearm stemming from a shooting where the complainant was shot 17 times but survived. Although Ariel’s client’s DNA was present on a hat sworn by the shooter at the scene and an eyewitness identified him to police, the Court was not satisfied that there was sufficient evidence of identity and discharged him.

10 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

R. v. A.

January 2022 Ariel successfully appealed a Superior Court judge's decision to commit his client to trial on a charge of first degree murder, arguing that the preliminary inquiry judge was correct in f

R. v B.

December 2021 Ariel's client was acquitted of serious fentanyl trafficking and firearm possession charges in Superior Court after the trial judge found that there was a reasonable doubt about his know

R. v A.

July 2021 Ariel's client was acquitted of possessing a loaded handgun despite videos of a person who appeared to be him in possession of the gun. His confession to possessing the firearm was excluded

bottom of page